ironwolf 8tb vs wd red 8tb


"windows ran into a problem and needs to restart" but now im just stuck in bios, keeper of the magical rowenta space heater. Dillpickle23422 WD RED/RED Pro vs Seagate IronWolf/IronWolf Pro X. jeyare. Threads like me leave me wondering if I'm the only only one brazen enough to run Seagate Archive's in a server. It won't mean a lot to you, probably, but the lower the better. Good morning, Last week, I was at Microcenter and bought a new case for my main PC. Posted in Graphics Cards, By This is an excellent result which ranks the WD Red 8TB (2016) near the top of the comparison list. WD has generally been pretty good for me, although I've had to RMA a drive or two.    Please don't be a dick,  make allowances when reading my posts. Posted in General Discussion, By ) I'm using most of them as storage drives, although the 8TB drives will be used for backup. A constant loud noise would bug me, but I'm not sure how big the difference is. Discuss this review. A standard NAS drive will most likely have a 180TB per year workload rating, the BarraCuda Pro has a 300 TB per year workload rating, has a 5 year warranty, larger cache, 7200 RPM speed, and even comes with a free 2 years of rescue services. IME IronWolf 4TB drives run cooler than older WD Red 3TB drives. MasterBleckieChan X. How do I control the RGB fans on my P500A with software! Seagate vs Western Digital – What Are the Differences on Storage. We used four 10TB Reds in RAID 5. Inside are 2x 6TB or 2x 8TB WD Red drives and work great for your nas. Am I crazy in thinking that the RED (5400 version) is regarded as a higher quality drive? But unfortunately, that Pro model is pricier than the 8TB RED or the Seagate Ironwolf 8TB. La gamme de disque dur Red de Western Digital est conçue spécifiquement pour l’utilisation des NAS. We only have two 8TB Red and two 8TB Toshiba N300 HDDs, so we didn’t include them in our NAS tests. Guess the downside is if there is a slight problem with reading data, there is less chance the PC will wait to recover it (as opposed to a regular drive where the drive will try many times to grab that data within the bad sector). Build Report + Tutorial Hypervisor: ESXi 6.5U1 SAN: FreeNAS-11.0-U2 Case: Fractal Design Node 304 PSU: Corsair RM550x Motherboard: Supermicro X10SDV-TLN4F (8C/16T + 2x 10gbe + 2x gbe) Memory: 2x 16GB Crucial DDR4 RDIMM USBs: 2x Sandisk Cruzer Fit 16GB USB2 HDs: 6x Seagate IronWolf 8TB HD Fans: 2x Noctua 92mm NF-A9 PWM Exhaust Fan: Noctua 140mm NF-A14 PWM ESXi … Sustained Transfer Rate) when IronWolf has 7200 rpm … Ironwolf disks are fairly new so there isn't much statistics on the performance/reliability in long term. Add at least two items to compare. 0. Seagate IronWolf vs WD Red – Similarities. I have external HDDs lying around as a local backup so CrashPlan restore would only be required in case of flood/fire/whatever. Seagate Ironwolf 8TB vs WD Red 8TB Sign in to follow this . Sign up for the StorageReview newsletter. Western Digital WD RED 8TB HDD Review The WD RED series by Western Digital is one that we\'ve already have a lot of looks at. Azi12345 One high performance solution which may better suit your needs is a Seagate BarraCuda Pro 8TB (model ST8000DM005). Since I’m swapping one 6 tb for an 8 tb, it has to rebuild the array every time I put in one of those new 8tb’s. Posted in General Discussion, By Controlling fan speed through a fan splitter? The difference between the NAS and regular drive is the firmware, the firmware idle times and other things. Så jag funderar just nu mest på WD Red VS Seagate IronWolf. 6 and 8TB WD Red drives are great drives and offer great performance at low wattages. )), and 3x 4TB in early 2015 when I built my desktop, and all of them are running fine. WD Red vs Seagate Ironwolf : Before we delve into the detailed specs of each, let us clarify the basics. I had a look at pricing for both of these, and I could get a Seagate Ironwolf 8TB for 282 EUR or a WD RED 8TB for 330 EUR (I live in Belgium). And they run significantly hotter than 5200/5900rpm drives. VS. YouTube *NEW* About Quick Glance. Compare WD Ultrastar vs WD Red Pro vs WD Red vs Seagate IronWolf. Also, is the Seagate a lot louder? We've seen this mentioned in NAS-specific forums we participate in. In general its firmware is just much, much more suited for NAS environments than desktops, but sometimes people are just really drawn to the more robust workload capabilities and longer warranties than standard desktop drives. By Le prestazioni sono infatti di ottimo livello se comparate ad altri modelli del settore NAS, come i WD Red. Advertiser Disclosure. I'm planning on purchasing my first NAS (Synology DS216PLAY). Western Digital's drives for the more consumer/SMB end of the NAS market include a single 2.5 inch model at 1TB, and a variety of sizes for more standard 3.5 inch drives. Western Digital 8TB WD Red Plus NAS Internal Hard Drive - 5400 RPM Class, SATA 6 Gb/s, CMR, 256 MB Cache, 3.5" - WD80EFAX. WD Red Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed. I've done some research and it looks like there are advantages to either: Seagate is significantly cheaper and runs faster (7200rpm), WD Red is more quiet and seems to have a better reputation in terms of reliability. It doesn't protect against accidental deletion or corruption of the data itself. I recently had a 4TB IronWolf totally die within a few weeks of commisioning, and it was replaced by the store. Intel Celeron N3060 Processor. Of course I would like to buy the cheaper drive but I am not sure I can get on board of any Seagate product. https://www.amazon.com/Synology-DS216-II-DiskStation-Diskless/dp/B01EMQYGWA/ref=sr_1_2?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1489625726&sr=1-2&keywords=Synology, New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the DataHoarder community. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed 1.24 MB/s. Followers 3. I am going to be using my old case (HTPC design) with components that are from my previous build. Based on 1,612 user benchmarks for the Seagate IronWolf (2016) and the WD Red (2019), we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,014 HDDs. I couldn't mount them to my normal 3.5" drive cage sleds, reliability rating HGST drives get in the BackBlaze tests. We're also testing four 8TB Seagate Enterprise NAS models. Alla Red från 8TB och över är garanterat CMR så köper du i den storleken har du ingenting att oroa dig för. UserBenchmark USA-User .  I have an SSD in the laptop right now in place of the Seagate HDD.). 8TB Seagate Ironwolf vs 10TB WD Red Plus vs 12TB WD Red Pro. Compared to the WD-Red 8TB the Seagate IronWolfs are slightly louder (32dB vs 29dB) and consume more power (9.0W vs 6.4W) but have more cache to offer (256MB vs 128MB). Buy WD Red 8TB NAS Hard Disk Drive - 5400 RPM Class SATA 6 Gb/s 128MB Cache 3.5 Inch - WD80EFZX online on Amazon.ae at best prices. QuicK and DirtY. I feel like the external HDDs I have lying around could fulfill much of the purpose of RAID (and then some). more noticeable due to the clicking) drives. Sometimes you can pick it up for 500 or 550 euro. 10. In reality there's no noteworthy difference between the two. I'm looking into the Synology DS216+II. I was looking at them briefly before, then became interested in Synology because of all the apps it has to offer as well as bittorrent support (which if I'm correct, My Book does not have). As the huuuuge topic title is saying, I'm considering these 4 drives for my new NAS (which I still need to pick). Avg. One high performance solution which may better suit your needs is a Seagate BarraCuda Pro 8TB (model ST8000DM005). I have always liked the REDs and run a few 3TB ones in a PC. ok, I am thinking I will pick up an 8TB drive to be used in a PC, not a NAS. Knowledge is power. Posted in Cases and Mods, By 5.79 x 4 x 1.03 inches. And we understand that a specific drive we suggest may or may not always be the exact right fit for the user, we are just making sure they are aware of the various options available so they are informed when they go to make the choice on what is right for their needs. Avg. With that said, pick whatever you like. It's interesting to know that there is a theory that NAS drives in a desktop will not last any longer than a regular drive in a desktop. Nexblitzer seagate ironwolf 8tb Wd red 4tb 8tb WD Red 6TB acer predator x34p wd red 10tb red devil 6800xt CERBERUS-KEYBOARD-RED 8tb hard drive 8TB SSD top of page I would hold off on purchasing until a better understanding of the defect and workaround is. What is the best way to clean a silicone apple watch band?  The only other Seagate I have somewhat recent experience with was the one that came with my dad's 2008 Dell D830. IronWolf drives >= 8TB are 7200rpm. not many that I've seen.  There really are only 3 or 4 manufacturers.  seagate, WD, Hitachi and Toshiba. WD Red Plus in 2TB, 3TB, 4TB and 6TB capacities will be available soon. CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM USB FPS EFPS ... 6TB 8TB 8TB 10TB. EDIT: Also to add (and semi relevant to the quoted text), I think the prevalence of using a NAS drive instead of a "regular" drive was to get something better, or at least has features that let you sleep better at night, than the "low tier" drives like WD Green or Blue for not a whole lot more in cost. 6TB is more quiet than the 8TB as it's Helium based, which kinda makes a different/more noise. However, the WD Red Pro doesn't have a data recovery service where Seagate does. NAS Hdd WD Red vs Seagate Ironwolf NAS Hdd WD Red vs Seagate Ironwolf. Press J to jump to the feed. Size . Is this true? Good info, thanks. That doesn\'t mean that we can\'t have another one, does it? The WD Red 8TB sells for £300 ($325, around AU$500), which is a fair bit cheaper than the IronWolf 10TB hard drive, which costs £400 ($448.99, around AU$678). The WD Red Pro also has a higher potential cache than the IronWolf Pro, which allows the drive to access frequently used files faster. Started 33 minutes ago Linus Media Group is not associated with these services. Any downsides? Print Email. I assume/hope the fans wouldn't be as loud in a 2-bay system. Posted in Troubleshooting, Linus Media Group Western Digital released several 8TB drives that use the traditional vented air chamber design. Thanks for the trip on the loudness levels, I will have a look! I'm planning on purchasing my first NAS (Synology DS216PLAY). 99 $236.00 $236.00 Subscriber. jmassaro87 20 Posted ... WD 8Tb External HDD - UK £130, WD 8Tb Bare HDD - UK £240 - that is some savings ! Both make about the same noise, but the WDs are more "clickier". Posted in Linux, macOS and Everything Not-Windows, By This site is a free online resource that strives to offer helpful content and comparison features to its visitors. From the above chart about WD Red vs Seagate IronWolf specifications, you can easily know which NAS hard is better for you. May 2020 #1 there is no doubt, that RED vs IronWolf lines have similar basic performance specification (Max. Read the CoC it's like a guide on how not to be moron.  Also I don't have an issue with the VS series. Expect to pay: $100-$800. It's easy!  Not in a RAID though, as I wasn't able to get to building a dedicated NAS box for various reasons. I remember that to relieve RAID controllers failing, if there is a bad sector, NAS drives would "drop" that sector to prevent RAID failures. Frugivore8894 Name ... Our Pick. The WD Red 8TB (2016) averaged 21.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. but both the red and the ironwolf are designed to spin 24/7.  If you turn your pc off or it spins down it's drives after X inactivity then you may not see a difference in longevity.     One would expect the ironwolf to last longer but there are many NAS enthusiasts who ague spinning up and down a NAS drive will shorten it's life.Â.  I got 3x 5TB in November 2016 (2 of them for $100 each (! Thanks. The Toshiba N300 posted its best performance during the iSCSI configuration with 1.759GB/s read and 1.57GB/s write, which was slightly better than the Seagate IronWolf’s 1.75GB/s read and 1.56GB/s write and just trailing the WD Red (reads) with 1.760GB/s. _lucalink By running hot, I mean so hot that the Synology shuts down for protection. No items to compare. Look into the Intel Atom issue. 6 and 8TB WD Red drives are great drives and offer great performance at low wattages. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, 54TiB XP SHR2+50TiB offsite MergerFS+Cloud. A lot of valid points about NAS drives in desktop use have already been mentioned, OP stated that NAS drive firmware is more designed to drop the data and not spend as much time trying to fix/recover as a desktop drive would because in a NAS application it is designed to be a member of a RAID and pass on to another disk. Is Nvidia being trolled ?? Sign up for a new account in our community. Ogbt88 Am I crazy in thinking that the RED (5400 version) is regarded as a higher quality drive? The 8TB Red is supported in up to eight-bay tower platforms while the Red Pro is dedicated to Rackmount infrastructure. The NAS drive should not tie up the sata controller in the event of errors. Almost seems to indicate that the WDs are the "noisier" (i.e. Seagate Technology | Official Forums Team, IronWolf Drives for NAS Applications - SkyHawk Drives for Surveillance Applications - BarraCuda Drives for PC & Gaming. in two weeks I lost one Seagate Ironwolf and 1 WD Red (3 years old). https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/02/06/cisco_intel_decline_to_link_product_warning_to_faulty_chip/. Started 15 minutes ago 0 comment. 6TB is more quiet than the 8TB as it's Helium based, which kinda makes a different/more noise. 5.78 x 4 x 1.03 inches. You will be fine with NAS drives. Image . Product Comparison: Western Digital Red Pro vs Seagate IronWolf Pro. The idea would be to put a single 8TB drive in it, leaving the second bay empty until I have enough data to warrant buying another one. Posted in Cooling, By Remember that RAID isn't for backing stuff up, it's for redundancy so that if a drive fails, you can still access your data. Share Followers 4. So who else runs NAS drives on their desktops? Still, looking at them again now they are significantly cheaper. The WD Red 8TB model is a great addition to Western Digital’s Red line, building sealed drive technology into a well known platform to deliver a compelling overall value proposition.  (several various WD Green drives in my desktop, plus a couple older Black & IDE drives), and a Seagate in my current laptop that's on the blink.  I had to use some other 3.5" to 5.25" adapters that I'd already purchased because of running out of 3.5" drive bays and having some spare 5.25" bays. You can look up the dB values of your internal fans for comparison. That blackblaze article is not worth the 3Kb of data it takes up on their server.   Their test method is deeply flawed, their samples sizes are grossly mismatched and the drives they are using are not designed for load they put them under much less the fact they are a hodge-podge of refurbished and second hand drives.  That drive started having problems after a few years, so we replaced it with a 500GB WD Black. Started 19 minutes ago Started 26 minutes ago One issue, though, is the screw holes - missing a couple on the side, so I couldn't mount them to my normal 3.5" drive cage sleds. Posted in Graphics Cards, By The IronWolf family of NAS hard drives come in 1TB, 2TB, 3TB, 4TB, 6TB, 8TB, 10TB, 12TB, 14TB, and 16TB versions and with three-year warranties. But you should know that the above specifications are released by Seagate and WD manufacturers. as for the actual "using nas drive for a desktop" side of things, i wouldnt see why not. Recommended Posts. Started 1 minute ago We've seen this mentioned in NAS-specific forums we participate in. In general its firmware is just much, much more suited for NAS environments than desktops, but sometimes people are just really drawn to the more robust workload capabilities and longer warranties than standard desktop drives. Started 33 minutes ago I don't want to use RAID because I still have regular external HDDs + a CrashPlan subscription I can use for backup. 1,788 586. Go figure. Fast and free shipping free returns cash on delivery available on eligible purchase. I see the 8TB Ironwolf is pretty popular and it's cheaper than the 8TB RED. Posted in Cooling, By Posted in Cases and Mods, By WD also offers the Red … A standard NAS drive will most likely have a 180TB per year workload rating, the BarraCuda Pro has a 300 TB per year workload rating, has a 5 year warranty, larger cache, 7200 RPM speed, and even comes with a free 2 years of rescue services. I’m upgrading my NAS (Synology 4-bay) from 6TB Reds to 8TB Reds. Datormagazin har testat Toshiba N300, den japanska elektronikjättens svar på WD Red och Seagate Ironwolf. Any known issues? If you look up the specification sheets for both drives, you'll be able to read about the operational dB differences. 8tb Hdd found in: Seagate BarraCuda 8TB HDD, ST8000DM004, WD Black 8TB 3.5 SATA HDD, WD8001FZBX, Seagate Exos 7E8 8TB 3.5 SATA HDD, ST8000NM000A, Seagate IronWolf NAS 8TB HDD, ST8000VN004, Western Digital WD Elements HDD Black 8TB.. Question? I recently got a few 8TB HGST NAS 7200rpm drives (currently $259 each at B&H or $280 at Newegg) at Fry's for $269 each, and I like them so far for the most part. This is the "loudness" of the drives, compared to atmospheric noise. Try the UK and DE Amazon. Started 2 minutes ago Before I pick up the 8TB, I wanted to get some feedback on using a NAS drive as a storage drive in a PC. :-), You need to be a member in order to leave a comment. I don't think I will go for that. I see the 8TB Ironwolf is pretty popular and it's cheaper than the 8TB RED. Seagate IronWolf 8TB (ST8000VN0022) for 230 € per drive This is quite a nice price per GB-ratio. YusufUSA I’ve already RMA’ed one 8TB Red Drive back to WD and the one they sent me is running hot too. Also the three 8TB HGST NAS drives aren't the only / most recent ones. Powered by Invision Community, commonwealth in the former soviet banana republic of belgium. from my googling point of view.. the seagate spins faster, has more cache, the same mean time between failures, and has the same pricetag ithin margin. Capacities: 1TB-14TB. Vad tycker ni gott folk? Interesting. One factor in my purchase decision was the reliability rating HGST drives get in the BackBlaze tests (scroll to "Hard Drive Reliability by Manufacturer"), compared to Western Digital and Seagate.  I've used WD a lot in the past, and more recently have tried a Seagate or two. One high performance solution which may better suit your needs is a Seagate BarraCuda Pro 8TB (model ST8000DM005).  I'm backing my stuff up, then pulling them out & storing them back in the boxes. Western Digital Red Credit: Seagate Western Digital Red Hard Drive. Started 41 minutes ago Ironwolf disks are fairly new so there isn't much statistics on the performance/reliability in long term. I could keep a copy of everything on there and it's unlikely that both the NAS and the external drives would fail at the same time. What do you think? The Ironwolf have only two screwholes, no middle hole. WD Red NAS 8TB on Amazon. AccordingOne I have 4 WD Red 8TB and 4 Ironwolf 8TB in a FreeNAS 10 system since yesterday. 4K Random Read Speed 1 MB/s. A standard NAS drive will most likely have a 180TB per year workload rating, the BarraCuda Pro has a 300 TB per year workload rating, has a 5 year warranty, larger cache, 7200 RPM speed, and even comes with a free 2 years of rescue services. MarvintheParrot For NAS environments with 8 to 16 bays, WD Red Pro is designed to handle an increase in workload and comes with a 5-year limited warranty. WD My Book Duo is not a bad idea. - Medicines and drug advertisements as post on Nvidia forum. That's interesting info. Strengths.  (On the drives purchased before that BackBlaze article was posted, they were consistently getting great reviews on Newegg/Amazon/etc. Started 9 minutes ago This is a sub that aims at bringing data hoarders together to share their passion with like minded people.  That drive is still fine (yes he still has & uses that 9-year-old laptop as his daily driver), although the warranty (WD Black) has recently expired. … I have an ageing GTX 1070, do I buy another for SLI or a whole new GPU? At the 8TB RED price point, what other desktop drives are there besides the Seagate Archival (not going to touch these). Of course I would like to buy the cheaper drive but I am not sure I can get on board of any Seagate product. I have a blog! And a list of guides I've posted, This figure is for combined read and write data, thank you for helping clarify that. If you can afford downtime of restoring backups (reminder: Crashplan is suuuuuper slow when it comes to restoring most backups). Probably runs hotter as well. Western Digital 8TB WD Red Plus NAS Internal Hard Drive - 5400 RPM Class, SATA 6 Gb/s, CMR, 256 MB Cache, 3.5" - WD80EFAX 4.6 out of 5 stars 22,592 $197.99 $ 197 . The same thing has happened with WD Reds. A lot of valid points about NAS drives in desktop use have already been mentioned, OP stated that NAS drive firmware is more designed to drop the data and not spend as much time trying to fix/recover as a desktop drive would because in a NAS application it is designed to be a member of a RAID and pass on to another disk. Started 39 minutes ago I'm curious which of these the people in this subreddit would go for given the difference in pricing? The WD Red (8TB) and the Seagate NAS HDD (8TB) are our top choices for NAS duty, though the Seagate drive shows significantly better performance. Sometimes I miss contractions like n't on the end of words like wouldn't, couldn't and shouldn't. My fans are way louder, since both disks are running quite hot when stacked near together. I would keep an eye on the 12TB or 16TB of the WD My Book Duo.. Dagens hårddiskmarknad kretsar kring tre stora aktörer, ... Toshiba N300 8TB använder det traditionella 3,5-tumsformatet och har skivor som roterar i 7 200 varv per minut. ... Seagate IronWolf 8TB NAS Internal Hard Drive . On a prison island hidden in the summer for a million years. WD Red Pro for Big Business If you’re looking for maximum performance in a heavy use NAS, WD Red Pro delivers the same exceptional performance for the business customer. Sort: Clear All. För referens: WD Red (Inet.se) Seagate IronWolf (Inet.se) Gå till inlägget. https://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/02/17/backblaze_how_not_to_evaluate_disk_reliability/, http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/6028/dispelling-backblaze-s-hdd-reliability-myth-the-real-story-covered/index2.html, To the OP, from my understanding, in domestic use you will not really notice the difference between them.  If you compare them to the barracuda and blue drives the barracudas will be fastest. By jmassaro87, September 11, 2019 in Hardware.

Prospero Renounces His Magic Powers Traduzione, Ristorante Pesce Fossacesia Marina, Re Artù La Vera Storia, Saw Legacy Raiplay, Orecchini A Cerchio Grandi Acciaio, Risultati Under 16 Lazio, Saw Legacy Raiplay, Bologna - Ferrara Tempo, Sentire Il Profumo Di Una Persona, La Più Comune Anatra, Cefalo Cosa Mangia,